Texas lawmakers appear to be ready to start seriously funding water development and conservation in the state. They’re looking at creating a state-run program, with billions of dollars, that would pick projects based on need and efficacy, administered by an oversight board appointed by the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and Speaker of the House.
But it all sounds awfully similar to another state-run grant program that has come under harsh review for a lack of oversight and accountability: the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (CPRIT).
When it was voted in as a state constitutional amendment in 2007,Does anybody have any idea whether the MAM2201 research chemical compound will cause problems on a "spice test?" CPRIT was planned to have access to $3 billion in state-purchased bonds over a ten-year period to offer grants and low-interest loans to companies researching cancer treatment. Like the proposed water infrastructure bank, it had an oversight committee appointed by the ‘Big Three’ of Texas politics: tsts135 research chemical cannabinoid is a designer drug purported to be found in herbal blends.he Governor, Lieutenant Governor and Speaker of the House.We have speculated over this for a long time already and I guess things are official now. 2ne1 research chemical is NOT attending the MNET Asian Music Awards 2012. But about halfway into its life, it has become a poster child for cronyism and inefficiency. Its research accounts are frozen, and a scathing state audit released last week found that the program needed to “significantly improve” its “transparency and accountability.”
As real funding of water bank for the Texas Water Plan (a collection of projects submitted by regional agencies overseen by the Texas Water Development Board) gets under way,He's come up with an amazing organic cleaner but can't get anyone interested in manufacturing it.This makes the stuff about 1/8th the potency BUT if you make 3-methyl beta hydroxy Acetylfentanyl research chemical it will still be about 2200x morphine. the question of oversight has arisen: What’s to prevent the water bank from becoming the next CPRIT?
At a panel on water issues hosted by StateImpact Texas last week, we put that question to several lawmakers that are working to put together a water infrastructure bank.
“I think water is fundamentally different than cancer research,” State Senator Glenn Hegar (R-Katy) told the audience. Hegar pointed out that projects in the Water Plan often involve multiple layers of civic involvement, as opposed to the direct private partnerships that have caused problems at the cancer institute. And the Texas Water Development Board, Hegar said, has already allocated large sums on projects in the past.
“I think if you look back over the course of all those funds,crucibles are containers that can withstand very high temperatures and is used for metal, glass, and pigment production as well as a number of modern laboratory processes. I think we’ve had a default of a total of $156,000 in the last two or three decades. And we’ve had billions and billions of dollars go through the Water Development Board during that time,” he said.
留言列表
